• Subscribe
  •  

    July 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

Inclusion in bankruptcy doesn’t equal discharged

Bankruptcy discharge, Dealing with debt, How bankruptcy works

One of the petty struggles I have with clients is convincing them that they need to include all of their debts in bankruptcy. Sometimes, they will tell me they don’t want to include their car loan in the case because they “need the car”. Sometimes I find the student loan payment in the budget but not on the list of creditors.

Part of the issue is grounded in confusion between scheduling a debt and discharging the debt. Debtors are required to list all of their debts and risk denial of discharge if they don’t. However, debts are not necessarily discharged just because they are listed. The Bankruptcy Code specifies a number of debts that simply aren’t dischargeable in bankruptcy. Those debts still must be listed.

The desire to exclude debts from the schedules is sometimes fanned because debtors don’t know that they can reaffirm debts during their case. A reaffirmation agreement essentially waives the discharge as to that particular debt and puts the parties back on the same legal footing as they had before the bankruptcy was filed.

Clients are frequently surprised when they learn that they can continue to pay a discharged debt voluntarily if they wish. “Pay the dentist after the case is filed if you wish, but list them in the bankruptcy if you owe money when the case is filed. ”

Then, there are the clients who “love” their credit card issuer and want to keep paying because of loyalty or out of fear of being without plastic. I have to tell them that for some card issuers, the love is one sided, and the issuer will cancel the card independently of being listed or not in the case.

Moral of the story, there are a number of options for debts post filing, so don’t get tripped up by leaving out creditors.

2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. goldstein  •  April 20, 2008 @6:17 am

    I too have struggled with my clients to make them understand the importance of including all of their creditors in their schedules and statements. Frequently I have to explain to my clients even if they have a zero balance on a card, they may very well loose it as soon as the creditor receives notice of their filing.

  2. carmenga  •  April 20, 2008 @10:43 am

    The lawyers have to explain everything related to their clients bankruptcy, it is not common sense. I’ve just filed bankruptcy this week, I hope everything is fine with my paperwork.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.